"Get all the fools on your side and you can be elected to anything." ~ Frank Dane
The second of my posts about how the leftists treat Conservatives as opposed to how they treat their own:
If Sarah Palin was really wrong about Paul Revere, her gaffe would still be less of a stupid idiotic statement than this one:
And yet, no Liberal so-called journalists dare admit the obvious.
Paul Revere's famous ride occurred over 225 years ago, during a time when the media was limited to writing, by hand, about events that transpired, after the fact, and before witnesses, and rarely were the events actually witnessed first hand by those who reported them in the newspapers of the day.
What Sarah Palin said was in response to a reporter asking her what she had learned about history on her stop in Boston.
She already knew what all the rest of us did, that Revere rode through the towns, alerting the people that the regulars were coming, but she had learned something else that day. She learned he also warned the British soldiers that the American patriots were ready to defend themselves.
Now, after 225 years plus, Sarah Palin knows more about the events on that day than Barack Hussein Obama knew about the current geographical boundaries of the United States of America!
And the Libs say she's stupid!
Well, if she's stupid for knowing facts that the reporters don't know, how stupid does that make Obama?
I mean, she has an excuse for possibly being slightly mistaken about something that happened 225 years ago.
Obama has no excuse.
He's just an imbecile.
And so are the rest of the Liberals.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
I couldn't get the video to play. My computer or a problem with the HTML?
Don't know, AOW. It plays for me. But, you've seen it before. It's the video of him saying he's been to 57 states.
It played fine for me. This is the first time I've seen the actual video, although I've heard about it often.
This demonstrates conclusively that Obama has no clue without a teleprompter. And it also told me when I first heard it that he has no clue about the real USA!
Keep beating this horse to death, Mark. Maybe it will whinny and warn the British.
So, Jim. You aren't going to even try to defend this guy you say is so smart, eh? You're just going to keep believing what the jackasses in the media spoon feed you, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.
Facts are facts, and the plain fact is, Palin was right and Obama was wrong.
If you can't see that, you're as stupid as they are.
Come on, Jim, don't cop out on me. Explain how your hero came up with 60 states. Then explain to me how this makes him smart.
You can't, can you?
Hey, Jim, how many states ARE there? Do you know? Or are you going to say the U.S. has 60 states now that your Fuhrer has proclaimed it?
What I think is more telling about our boy president in this video is his callous dismissal of Hawaii and Alaska as being irrelevant to the election--might have been true, but kind of rude to mention it...
And no mention of those OTHER states, Kenya and the Phillipines...
The moronic troll "jim" said...
" Maybe it will whinny and warn the British."
He still doesn't get it, Mark. Revere wasn't 'warning' the British, Jim. He was trying to trick them into thinking that an overwhelming force would meet them should they try to seize our guns, so they should not make the attempt...
I see the video now.
There are 57 states in the OIC. Coincidence?
Actually AOW, Obama thinks there are 60 states in the U.S.
He said he's been to 57, with one to go, but his handlers won't let him go to Hawaii and Alaska. Add them up. That's 60.
I feel no need to defend an exhausted candidate for a minor slip of the tongue. You can make fun of it as much as you like. No one but a moron thinks that Obama ever believed there are 60 states.
"Palin was right". No. She wasn't. She was trying to suck up to her second amendment fans by turning a local historical incident into an NRA commercial.
Dick said, "Revere wasn't 'warning' the British, Jim."
Thank you.
If Palin had said, "I learned something new today. Revere was stopped by a British patrol and at gunpoint divulged that the colonists were massing to oppose the Regulars." I would have bought that.
She didn't. She said that Revere road his horse through town ringing bells and firing shots in order to warn the British. This is not factually accurate.
This would simply be a laugh if Palin had just fessed up that she got a bit mixed up. But as usual, it's the media's fault for asking a "gotcha question" of "What have you seen so far today, and what are you going to take away from your visit?"
And then you all make it a really BIG joke by trying to make the case that she purposely characterized Paul Revere's historical significance as warning the British. What a historical trailblazer is Sarah!
Nnnna-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-ayyyyyy!
Really Jim.
Then why are Liberal historians
now admitting, grudgingly, that she was right?
Dude, you'd make excuses for Obama if he went on a killing spree. You're pathetic.
It's rare I find a blog post without something in it I can disagree with or at least question - but you just made an inescapable argument. If a liberal reads this, he/she will spontaneously combust!
"You can make fun of it as much as you like"
Thank you. I will, but I don't need your permission to make fun of the Idiot-in-chief.
In spite of all Obama's efforts to enslave us, it's still a free country, and I can say whatever I want.
"In spite of all Obama's efforts to enslave us..."
Is there an emoticon for rolling one's eyes?
Post a Comment