In a Facebook discussion about the entrance of Rick Santorum into the 2012 Presidential race, I learned something new about Liberals. That is, how low Liberals will stoop to attack their ideological opponents.
Rick SantorumOne commenter in the thread said he wished Santorum would change his name, which prompted me to ask why. He responded that I should Google the name, "Santorum".
Well, I did as he suggested, and was appalled and sickened by what I found.
Is there a depth to which Liberals won't sink to disparage people?
From what I learned, an immoral, soulless, disgusting, perverted Sodomite named Dan Savage, feigned outrage at Former Senator Rick Santorum after he stood up for family values, and attacked the Senator by creating an alternative definition of the word, "santorum".
Disgusting little PervertI use the words "alleged" and "feigned" purposely, because typically, these Liberals really know the truth but choose to deny the facts.
This is the sort of person who would have us accept his aberrant filthy, disgusting, immoral, deviant lifestyle as normal, and even worse, natural!
Do you think a mind capable of creating such a vile, disgusting, synonym for anyone's name is a natural, normal mind? Or is it a deviant mind?
A perverted mind-in-the gutter like that is the only sort of mind that could conceive such an absolutely revolting concept.
There is no love in this "man", and I use the term loosely. There is no honor. There is no respect. He is a vile, disgusting, little pervert. I cannot conceive the amount of self-loathing this deviant little creature possesses.
He is appropriately named.
Savage's entire biography reads like a litany of perversion.
He is nothing more than a savage. He is everything that is evil in the world and nothing that is good. He is evil incarnate.
And, like every other Liberal, he is unbelievably stupid.
37 comments:
Stupid and Evil, that's a terrible combination--But smart and evil is deadly...
Well, I just googled "Santorum."
I'm still retching.
What is wrong with people???
Mark,
Off topic, but I think that you should take a look at THIS. Thugocracy from the Left -- yet again!
Great points. Think about this irony as well: Savage is so blinded by his hatred that he thinks he'll defame Santorum by linking his name to a disgusting byproduct of homosexual sex.
See what he did? Savage & Co. commit an act that has an absolutely disgusting consequence and they think it harms their ideological enemy to name it after him. But it is the disgusting consequence of the behavior of Savage & Co., not Santorum. So who are they really slamming?
Neil, the prevert's attempt to sully Santorium's reputation is proof that homosexuality is a deviant behavior. Normal people are sickened by the mental picture it conveys.
AOW, yeah, that's pretty loathsome, but we both can easily find much worse examples of Liberal thuggery.
"What is wrong with people???"
Moral bankruptcy.
Rick, who says these cretins are smart?
Ever notice how liberals can't live their ideology? "Peace, love, tolerance, blah, blah, blah"
Savage held a contest to come up with an alternative meaning for "santorum" after the other Santorum compared homosexuality to child molestation, incest and beastiality.
I'd say Santorum got what was coming to him.
BTW, homosexuals are not the only ones who engage in the act mentioned on Google.
It doesn't matter who else engages in that particular act - it is a wrong use of the human body nevertheless.
In that it is a perversion and misuse of human sexuality, homosexual behavior is indeed just like pedophilia, bestiality, and incest. God doesn't approve of any of them.
"I'd say Santorum got what was coming to him"
With that statement, Jim, you've proven yourself to be an evil evil man.
The love of God or even decency is not in you.
Worship leader, my ass.
You are a liar and a pervert, just like Mr. Savage.
Anyway, he didn't compare Homosexuality with those other perversions. He said, "I have a problem with homosexual acts"... the right to privacy, as detailed in Griswold v. Connecticut, doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution"... "whether it's polygamy, whether it's adultery, whether it's sodomy, all of those things are antithetical to a healthy, stable, traditional family... [sodomy laws properly exist to prevent acts that] undermine the basic tenets of our society and the family"
50 years ago homosexuality was considered a mental disorder. Now, the push to normalize it has brought us to this place of blatant hedonism. The slippery slope has gotten slipperier and steeper.
Even now, NAMBLA is pushing normalization of child molestation aggressively, and with the power of money and lawyers behind them, they will no doubt eventually succeed.
Lobbying aggressively is how homosexuals reached so-called "legitimacy" in our society.
Polygamy is becoming less and less a cultural taboo, even to the point that National Television programs are actively promoting it as just another of "alternative lifestyle"
50 years ago, no one would have predicted homosexuality would become "normal" in so many people's eyes. How can anyone say with any certainty that bestiality will not have become the norm in the next 50 years?
Seig Heil, Sex Nazi!
Ha! I knew it would come to this.
I have to admit, I thought you stoop to calling me a Nazi long before this. But I knew you'd do it eventually.
Yep. When Liberals can't defend their defenseless positions, they always resort to name calling.
But...
Now I'm doing it, too. How does it feel, Jackass?
Give it up, Jim. You're a loser and you know it.
Leave it to the anonymous pervert "jim" to once again prove Godwin's Law, descending to depths even lower than we thought possible for him: Reductio ad Hitlerum.
Guess he's run out of illogical arguments...
If I recall correctly, the Nazi party was started by sexual perverts, including mostly homophiles, and a good percentage of the party remained as such!
So when anyone calls someone a "sex Nazi" they obviously have no clue!
First they redefined marriage. Then they redefined santorum. I say we fight back. I say we redefine "making sense."
@Neil: Totally agree. The irony is lost on them.
Mark,
"What is wrong with people???"
Moral bankruptcy.
Indeed.
"Now I'm doing it"
Now? Now you are doing it?
"Jim, you hateful idiot. "
"Obama is a moron and so are you."
"you're as stupid as they are"
"You're pathetic."
"Jim, you idiot."
"calling me a Nazi"
I didn't call you a Nazi. I called you Sex Nazi. You are apparently culturally ignorant not to know the origin of this reference.
"You're a loser"
And your very first response to my first comment on this page (containing no name calling): "You are a liar and a pervert."
Who is the name-caller?
Glenn said, "So when anyone calls someone a "sex Nazi" they obviously have no clue!"
Speaking of someone who has no clue. I give you Glenn. I made no reference to the Nazi Party, any Nazi specifically or Nazis in general. I can't help it if you are culturally ignorant.
Jim,
Just like other liberals, you want to use the term "Nazi" for whatever you desire, but it has a real meaning and that is of the Nazi party. Typical of liberals, you want to redefine everything.
"I did not have sex with that woman!"
"marriage means any two consenting people - or maybe any three or four."
"niggardly sounds like nigger so put the guy on the rack!"
"Gay doesn't mean happy - it means homosexually inclined."
"it depends on what your definition of 'it' is!"
"I know he said 57, but he meant 50!"
ETC, ETC, ETC.
"it depends on what your definition of 'it' is!"
Proving you are culturally and historically challenged. It's "is" is.
"the term "Nazi" ... has a real meaning and that is of the Nazi party."
Not always. For all you culturally challenged, I give you Seinfeld and "The Soup Nazi" (from wikipedia):
"The Soup Nazi" is the title of the 116th episode of the NBC sitcom Seinfeld, which was the 6th episode of the 7th season. It first aired in the United States on November 2, 1995.
The Soup Nazi is also the nickname of the titular character played by Larry Thomas. The term "Nazi" is used as an exaggeration of the excessively strict regimentation he constantly demands of his patrons.
Note that there is not a single reference to the Nazi party, any Nazi, homophiles, killing Jews or anything of the sort.
The Soup Nazi's signature line was, "No soup for you!"
I borrowed it, tweaked it, and gave it to Mark, who is clearly the Sex Nazi. "No sex for you!"
The anonymous nazi troll "jim" makes no sense. I think he may be a second grader with a learning disability. Anyway, sounds that way to me.
I think the fascinating thing about him is that he continues to come back here, day after day, to be proven wrong and hated on. You'd think he'd get tired of that.
WAIT! I just thought of something--I wonder if "jim" is really Mark in disguise????
That would explain a lot of things--I mean, does anybody really believe anybody could be a stupid as "jim"?
I think Mark made him up, just to gin up interest in his blog! Mark, you are a genius, a master entertainer! You certainly have the libtard way of thinking ( and I use the term loosely) down pat!
BRILLIANT!!!!
[oops sorry for outing you]
Yes, Jim. Now, I'm doing it, a reference to a previous post where I said I am going to start adopting the Liberals tactic of personally attacking opponents simply because I disagree with them. Try to keep up.
Yes, now I'm doing it, Stupid.
How does it feel?
t" is vs "is" is was a typo! I hate when that happens.
I don't care what culture has done, Nazi has a meaning.
I never bothered with Seinfield - I want my entertainment to be intellectually stimulating.
De gustibus non disputandum est.
Admission to Mark (or me?):
I have to admit to mixing up two different blogs here. I have used the Sex Nazi term for Marshall over at Marshall Art's. Since this post was on one of his favorites subjects, I got mixed up. The result is that I used the term Sex Nazi here without the context that would be found on the other blog.
And Sex Nazi has NOTHING to do with Hitler or the Nazis regardless of Glenn's "cultural backwardness". :-)
I'm not culturally backward. But using Nazi for every thing really trivializes the horrors of that ideology.
It's a sit-com, Glenn. Sorry you don't get it.
Sit-coms are for the intellectually bankrupt.
The point still stands - to use the word "Nazi" in such a fashion trivializes the horrors perpetrated by the Nazis. But then, liberals are always trivializing important things.
"But then, liberals are always trivializing important things."
What-EVer.
Jim said...
"What-EVer."
I KNEW IT! "jim" is a little girl!
BTW, did you know EVERY episode of Seinfeld has Superman somewhere in it????
Yes I did know that.
I like Seinfeld. I have the entire 7th season on DVD. The one with the "Soup Nazi" episode, which also happens to be my favorite of all the episodes.
That said, calling me a sex nazi has a completely different connotation than the character on Seinfeld.
One was humorous, your appellation is intended to be, and taken to be, an insult.
Think about it Mark. My use of the term is EXACTLY like that of the Seinfeld character. Very regimented. You will do it the way I say it must be done or "no soup (sex) for you!"
It has nothing to do with Hitler, Germany, or the National Socialist party.
Jim: You do a perfect job of making our case for us.
Thanks.
Post a Comment