Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Who's The Cowboy Now?

"For they are yet ear-kissing arguments." ~ William Shakespeare

Remember when the Liberals called George W. Bush a "cowboy" because he so recklessly got our country involved in an "illegal war"? Remember how they complained that he only invaded Iraq to avenge his daddy?

Never mind the 16 UN resolutions at which Saddam Hussein repeatedly thumbed his nose.

Forget that intelligence sources reported the existence of evidence for WMD. It doesn't matter that he murdered thousands of his own people and invaded Kuwait. His repeated threats against America meant nothing.

This is what we were told by the Liberal intelligentsia:

George W Bush was wrong. He was a war monger. He was a war criminal. He was a cowboy.

All of these appellations and more were common throughout the media and the blogosphere.

Now, we have Obama's war on Libya.

Look at this chart:

For you Libs who can't make simple connections, the above chart shows the difference between the reasons for Bush's "illegal war" in Iraq, and the reasons for Obama's altruistic civilian rescue mission in Libya.

I have to admit, it's hard for me to understand how intelligent people could have fallen for Obama's "ear kissing arguments", but, it happens. Smarter people than they have been fooled.

Many Liberals are already regretting their support of Barack Hussein Obama. Many are now admitting they may have been deluded. Dennis Kucinich, rabid anti-war Liberal, has denounced Obama and even called for his impeachment because of this Libyan incursion.

My own Liberal Doctor Nephew admitted on Facebook, when introducing a link to a video, "This is dedicated to operation "Odyssey Dawn," with a great big f--- you very much to President Obama, who (as I'm starting to believe) conned me into voting for him."

And, in an additional post, "Reading articles like this, about the 2004 softening of (business) relationships between the US and Libya, would be funny if it didn't also provide such a compelling explanation for why the Obama Administration has now decided to bomb Libya, out-Bushing George W. in his haste to employ military 'solutions.'"

In all fairness to my beloved nephew, at least he is consistent. He is anti-war, and that stance has led him to question his judgment. He will not blame his mistake on others. I say, good for him!

Now, for you other Liberals. It's time for you to come clean.

Clear your conscience. Just admit you made the mistake of supporting this man who is incompetent and despises the Constitution of the United States.

But, for God's sake, stop pretending that you still support this man in spite of all the proof that he cares about no one but himself. Grow up! Grow a pair! Admit you were wrong!

I won't gloat, I promise. I understand people can make mistakes. I understand that some people are gullible enough to simply believe all the promises a charming charismatic Presidential candidate makes. I've done it in the past myself. I once supported Carter for president, for God's sake!

There is forgiveness in the Republican party.


Randy said...

I don't know, but I suspect that many liberals are appalled by the recent actions in Libya. Publicly, they'll make excuses - no troops on the ground, protecting Libyans from their ruler, etc, etc.

Forgiveness in the Republican party? Hardly. If Obama's not liberal and anti-interventionist for them, the R's certainly aren't. I suspect they'll sit out the next election...

Edwin Drood said...

its funny how Dan and his buds are off on some fanciful reminiscing about spring or their favorite songs. No war, no civilian abuses in Afghanistan, its all good.

Just spring flowers and happy songs.

Mark said...

I wouldn't know, Edwin. I don't bother wasting my time with Dan (and Geoffrey's) crap.

Mark said...

Randy, I mean the Republican party will gladly welcome ex Liberals in and forgive them their transgressions against sanity.

daniel noe said...


Mark said...

Dan, Ambiguity.

Z said...

Republicans go into Iraq after a dictator has killed 300,000 Kurds and SO much more...= BAD

Democrats go into Libya after a dictator has threatened to kill much less than 300,000 of his people ...=GOOD!'re so right, Mark.

Always On Watch said...

Wow, that chart is revealing!

Of course, Obama is not being held accountable by the mainstream media. He's not a Republican.

I grow so weary of the double standard.

Always On Watch said...

Linked at Infidel Bloggers Alliance.

Mark said...

It is interesting to me that my resident Libs are staying silent on this post. Could it be I finally got it through their heads that they are supporting a buffoon?

Krystal said...

There was a democrat on Fox who used the "I" word (impeachment) recently in regards to Obama's action in Libya.

Joe said...

Krystal: We can only hope!

Jim said...

I guess you all missed this from March 1, 2011:

The Senate unanimously approved a nonbinding resolution on Tuesday calling for the United Nations Security Council to impose a no-fly zone over Libya and urged Libyan leader Muammar el-Qaddafi to resign and allow a peaceful transition to democracy.

Jim said...

Chirp, chirp, chirp, chirp.