"We are advertis'd by our loving friends." ~ William Shakespeare
While I was driving back home on my road trip to Kansas City and Wichita, Kansas, and scrolling through the radio stations, I heard a short blurb from American Family News Network about illegal campaign contributions to B. Hussein Obama's campaign.
Naturally, I tried in vain to find anything about this story on any "mainstream" media network, but couldn't find it anywhere. Not even on Fox News.
It seems to me this should be a major story. As it has been reported, According to Federal Election Commission filings, Barack Obama has received illegal donations from Palestinians living in Gaza, a hotbed of Hamas terrorists.
The report goes on to say, Obama received more than $24,000 in campaign contributions over a period of two months last fall from three Palestinian brothers from the "Edwan" family in Rafah, Gaza, which is a Hamas stronghold along the border with Egypt.
And, Attorney and conservative commentator Debbie Schlussel notes foreign nationals are barred from making contributions in connection with any election -- federal, state, or local -- and an individual is allowed to give only $2,300 per election to a federal candidate or the candidate's campaign committee.
"The donations are basically through and through illegal -- that's number one. And number two is how the Obama campaign tried to conceal it," Schlussel chides. "They listed the campaign contributions as coming from Rafah, Georgia. They used the 'GA' from Gaza so it makes it look like it's legal; and then for the zip code it says '972,' which is actually the area code to dial over to Gaza," she contends.
I echo Ms. Schlussel's observation that, if the Obama campaign is willing to "accept thousands of dollars beyond the legal limit and they're also going to flout [Federal Election Commission] restrictions...that's very indicative of what kind of president [Obama] is going to be."
I will go one further that that. I have always said I don't rule out the unlikely possibility B. Hussein Obama is an undercover Muslim who is trying to get elected President so he can destroy America from the inside. I'm not asserting that theory to be true, I'm just not ruling it out.
Even if he isn't a Muslim plant, and if the contribution came from Hamas or terrorist supporters in Gaza, this story would seem to indicate the terrorists want Obama to be elected President. If that's true, it begs the question, "why would terrorists want Obama to be President of the United States?"
It could be they see Obama as the "Paper Tiger" that Usama bin Laden declared the United States to be, (back during another Democratic administration) or it could be they truly have an ally in Obama. In any case, they obviously don't see Obama as any threat.
Whatever the reason, the fact that B. Hussein's campaign is not only accepting illegal campaign contributions from Palestinian nationals, but covering them up as well, should send up a huge red flag to patriotic Americans of all parties.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
You forget my friend that in addition to winning the Berlin and Paris Primaries, Obama has recieved the endorsement of Hamas and Hezbollah.
So it is only natural that they donate to their chosen candidate.
This guy is the most dangerous candidate to ever run for office this country has ever known. At least the people are not buying into him yet as he can't seem to make a move in the polls despite massive media publicity!
Mark, I did a post on my blog about this, this past Thursday. I also told about his attempts to interfere in the Kenyan elections in 2007 in an attempt to get his cousin, a Muslim, elected and how it ended up in a near civil war. If you are interested, check out the blog for this past Thursday. Just scroll down to where it says : THE OBAMA MUSLIM CONNECTION.
It’s a fragile road we walk. To even suggest influence from Islamic extremist is to invite ridicule.
Yet…yet…again and again, we’re subjected to questionable activities by this man.
Of course if McCain even looked at a county boy with a shotgun in his truck and a confederate flag sticker on his bumper, we’d all know how the media would play it.
But in the end – it’s all spin. You’re either spun clockwise or you’re spun counter-clockwise.
I think the Most Dangerous Candidate title may still be up for grabs. Sen. John Kerry, D-Hanoi still tops our list--but then again, the Democrat Socialist Party has been putting up some pretty terrible individuals for the last fifty years!
Thanks, Ken. I didn't forget. I am simply offering a somewhat controversial explanation for why the Terrorists seem to want Hussein to be our President. Other than the possiblility they think he would help them in their terrorist endeavor, I don't see why they would care.
Abouna, Yes, I read it. I read all your posts. I just don't always have time to comment.
Blamin, I often take controversial positions, not necessarily because I believe them to be true, but to urge people to think about other possibilities besides the obvious. It opens me up to ridicule, but I just consider the source. It has often been said, if you are attacked by those with other opinions it could be because you hit a little too close to home.
Rick, You think Kerry was worse? I don't see that. He would have been a do-nothing President, just like the rest of the democrats in Congress.
But Hussein, with his blatant support of terrorism, both foreign and domestic is much worse in my opinion.
I’ve been through many, many presidential elections. A common theme has been to suggest the “other” candidate will hurt this country.
Never, at least in my lifetime, has there been a more dangerous candidate, then BHObama.
Even if you ignore, and discount all the people he’s surrounded himself with throughout his life time, even if you ignore his and his wifes “off the prompter” remarks; he’s still a sorely lacking, vapid, grossly unqualified individual.
McCain’s, Spears – Hilton comparison is right on target. The only thing this man has going for him is charisma.
It remains to be seen if that’s enough to win in these United States of America, or if it will take a few more years to see that strategy through.
"we’re subjected to questionable activities by this man."
And what activities would these be?
"he’s still a sorely lacking, vapid, grossly unqualified individual."
Speaking of sorely lacking, vapid, grossly unqualified individual[s], did you vote for George W. Bush in 2000?
W, W, W,
Considering the alternative, yes, I voted W.
Now, I'm getting damn tired of voting for the less crappy, but what choice do I have?
Questionable activities?
He associates with racists, terrorists and crooks. He supports letting infants die after surviving abortions.
George Bush, for all his faults, was a governor, owned a pro-ball team, worked in the oil industry. Even if we concede that he did all that poorly, he still did SOMETHING that qualifies as leadership and executive ability. Barry? Nothing.
Also, keep in mind that Bush's tax cuts have helped keep the economy chugging along well throughout his administration until only recently. And his lifting of the executive restriction on drilling lowered the price of oil. Not bad for an unqualified individual.
Don't try to compare Obama to Bush. On his worst day, and George has had a few, he's still head and shoulders the better president than Barry will ever be, if we are so unfortunate as to see him elected.
Post a Comment