Monday, June 21, 2010

Presidential Fail

"I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts." ~ Will Rogers

This is no joke. Obama has admitted to refusing to secure our borders.

These are the words to the oath of office that every president-elect is required to repeat upon his inauguration:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."


The number one job of the President of the United States of America is to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. If the President of the United States of America refuses to defend the people of the United States, whom the Constitution was written to protect, shouldn't he be impeached, and removed from office?



If evidence is presented to the American people that the President of the United States is refusing to secure our borders for the sake of some pet legislation, shouldn't his impeachment and subsequent removal from office be demanded by the American people?

Is Barack Hussein Obama fit to be President of the United States?

In my opinion, he is not only unfit to hold the office of President of the United States of America, he should be tried for treason.

Cross posted at American Descent

24 comments:

Jim said...

he should be tried for treason

Go for it!

Trader Rick said...

We've said this before: He should be tried, convicted and executed.

Most Rev. Gregori said...

Mark, their are so many provable things out there that Obama should be impeached on, but even if we could gain control over Congress, I seriously doubt that Congress would ever have the "nads" to do it. By the same token, I doubt they will even have the WILL to repeal Obamacare.

Obama should be charged with:

A.) Violations of the Constitution of the United States;

B.) Violation of his Oath of Office;

C.) Dereliction of Duty;

D.) Malfeasance of Office;

E.) Usurpation of Power;

F. Crimes against the American people;

I could go on, but I think you get the picture.

Jim said...

"their are so many provable things out there"

Hey Rev. Nice laundry list. Can you provide specifics at all for each one? I think the Senate will need some actual articles of impeachment and maybe some kind of proof for each.

Go for it!

Trader Rick said...

"Jim", it's not fair of you to ask the Rev. for specifics--If you would pick up a newspaper once in a while, read internet news, or watch Fox News on TV, you would know what we are talking about and what every school child knows. Wake up and pay attention to current events; don't be so lazy. In order to make intelligent comments, you need to be better informed of the world around you. I suggest taking out just 20 minutes a day studying what's going on in the world, getting info from a reliable factual source before you post any further--I'm sure the patriotic Americans here would rather hear from an informed logical radical leftist than a goofy one...

Mark said...

"Can you provide specifics at all for each one?"

Jim didn't you read the post?

In fact, the prosecutable violations of Obama are numerous, but it only takes one to impeach.

He is refusing to secure the border until Congress passes his pet legislation. That, Jim, is blatant extortion. Period. Extortion is not only an impeachable offense, it is a felony. If convicted, Obama would rightfully have to go to jail.

I don't know how much plainer we can be.

Anonymous said...

actually you have no proof of extortion you have John Kyl a known liar making accusations that no one else in the meeting including other republicans claim was stated. AKA he is full of shit, and you are enjoying eating it.

Most Rev. Gregori said...

To Anonymous: You sir a typical leftist. Why is it that leftist twits always have to resort to abusive language when they disagree with those on the right? There is no debating with you people on an intellectual level because you folks always resort to shouting and vulgarity. For your information, Sen. Kyle is one of more honest members of congress.

Mark said...

Anon, actualy, that is the first time I've ever heard John Kyl is a "known liar". Every testimonial I've heard about him is that he is one of the more honest members of Congress.

I guess, if we have to judge which man is more believable, we'd have to look at their records, and Obama's record is one of lies and deceit since long before his election. I have yet to hear of any evidence that Kyl has ever lied about anything.

Always On Watch said...

In my opinion, he is not only unfit to hold the office of President of the United States of America, he should be tried for treason.

I agree.

But I don't see it happening, primarily because the race card would be played.

Timothy said...

The problem is that we have been saying all along that he is unfit for office... but the "useful idiots" voted him in anyway.

Trader Rick said...

Some people think both John Kerry and B. Hussein Obama, if convicted of Treason, should be executed. I think I'm leaning more toward Life in Prison...Maybe Soweto, since he has (illegally) served as President, should be given a pass, and just removed from office and denied his civil rights. That might be less embarrassing for the country.

On a related topic, if Obama was removed from office due to disqualification, i.e. his foreign birth, Would he be stripped of his presidency in the history books or would there be an asterisk next to his name (Whatever that is)? Sort of like a NCAA football team being stripped of victories/ titles like UCLA?

Jim said...

Fox News on TV, you would know what we are talking about and what every school child knows. Wake up and pay attention to current events; don't be so lazy.

I quote this as representative of the huge pile of horse manure you all have plopped here.

I read the papers, the blogs, listen to the radio, and watch TV including FOX News. All of it.

There is not ONE THING that you can name that comes anywhere near an impeachable offense. NONE. I DOUBLE DARE YOU to provide ANYTHING.

And don't come up with this phony refusing to secure the border. He has done NO LESS than any other president in decades, much less George W. Bush. By the way, political wheeling and dealing is NOT an impeachable offense. (And that's making a HUGE assumption that Kyl is being truthful.)

So that is the phoniest of the phony.

don't be so lazy.

No, the one who is lazy is you guys who refuse to enumerate ANY actual impeachable offense but tell me to watch the news.

I'm calling bull plus shit.

Trader Rick said...

So "Jim" is NOT a clueless Obama-Zombie. He's just stupid.

Jim said...

Yep, I'm stupid for your failure to list the specifications of your wild ass charges.

O....K.

KEvron said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
KEvron said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Mark said...

My rules haven't changed, Kevron. And I haven't forgotten you. I just thought I had gotten rid of you. Don't make me re-enable comment moderation.

Trader Rick said...

"Jim" it's OK to be stupid, we can't all be Einsteins. You have taken an important first step in personal improvement by realizing, and admitting in public that you are not too bright. We all have shortcomings and areas of improvement potential. It's what we do about it that counts.

Now that you realize you have little intellect, there are ways to actually improve your thought processes-- I suggest a basic course in logic. You can probably find one in your area thru adult education. I know that many of the principles in basic logic I learned as a college freshman have stayed with me and been a help all these years.

Next, you could learn to keep quiet and LISTEN, BEFORE YOU MOUTH OFF and let all that stupidity drool out of your mouth. You might actually learn something by listening, then attempting to think about what you have heard or read.

Your profile is kind of sparse--I take you for say a 15 or 16 year old girl, am I close? You got pregnant and dropped out of school? Don't know your baby daddy? Didn't pay much attention in class? Got beat up a lot by other girls? If we knew a bit about your background we could better tailor some advise on your newfound path toward enlightenment...

KEvron said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
KEvron said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Most Rev. Gregori said...

Jim, lets try these out for size for impeachable offenses:

1.) Since taking the Oath of Office, Barack Hussein Obama has committed numerous and frequent violations of the oath in his capacity as President of the United States of America.

a.) He has instituted fiscal reforms that are bankrupting the United States;

b.) He has failed to fulfill his Constitutional responsibility of securing our borders, which has resulted in the rapes, kidnapping, and/or deaths of hundreds, if not thousands of innocent American citizens (men, women and children).

c.) He has engaged in the usurpation of powers not granted to him by the Constitution of the United States, through the passage and enactment of the Health Care Reform Act which will lead to more deaths, especially of those fifty-years and older due to reduced health care. This is based on the legislative framework of the Bill presumes that if you are over a certain age, your health care simply costs too much money. Provisions in the Bill are being made for you to be able to "choose" a painless death, perhaps through the British-tried-and-tested system of deep sedation.

d.) Barack Hussein Obama has illegally and unconstitutionally placed the following under direct federal control:

1.) Chrysler Automotive and General Motors;

2.) All student loans;

3.) Almost all banks and loan companies. The federal government now owns well over fifty-percent of all home loans.

I can list more but these will suffice. B, C, & D are ALL VIOLATIONS of the Constitution and Violations of the Constitution are Impeachable Offenses.

Jim said...

a.) He has instituted fiscal reforms that are bankrupting the United States;

Not true, not provable, only an opinion and one not shared by most economists. In fact, if you read what you said, it doesn't really make any sense. The largest single factor in the deficit after the economic downturn is the Bush tax cuts. Now THAT should have been an impeachable offense, by your standards. Case dismissed.

b.) He has failed to fulfill his Constitutional responsibility of securing our borders, which has resulted in the rapes, kidnapping, and/or deaths of hundreds, if not thousands of innocent American citizens (men, women and children).

No proven cause and effect, hyperbolic "statistics" which are not demonstrated. Obama has done more to secure the borders than the previous president. You didn't ask for his impeachment. Case dismissed.

c.) He has engaged in the usurpation of powers not granted to him by the Constitution of the United States, through the passage and enactment of the Health Care Reform Act

Last time I checked, this was passed by both houses of congress duly elected by the people and no successful lawsuit has been brought against it. Furthermore, most legal scholars disagree with your "assessment." Case dismissed.

which will lead to more deaths, especially of those fifty-years and older due to reduced health care. This is based on the legislative framework of the Bill presumes that if you are over a certain age, your health care simply costs too much money. Provisions in the Bill are being made for you to be able to "choose" a painless death, perhaps through the British-tried-and-tested system of deep sedation.

One BIG FAT LIE after another and/or the blatherings of an ignoramous or Sarah Palin (take your pick). Case dismissed.

d.) Barack Hussein Obama has illegally and unconstitutionally placed the following under direct federal control:

1.) Chrysler Automotive and General Motors;

Anybody sue him yet? Case dismissed.

2.) All student loans;

They are government guaranteed loans, you dummy. Why shouldn't the government control them and SAVE TAXPAYER MONEY? Case dismissed.

3.) Almost all banks and loan companies. The federal government now owns well over fifty-percent of all home loans.

Really? Not the one I work for. In fact I'd like to hear from any of these "almost all" companies not currently under bankruptcy proceedings that are under direct control or complaining about same.

Case dismissed. With prejudice!

KEvron said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.