"Don't let us make imaginary evils, when you know we have so many real ones to encounter." ~ Oliver Goldsmith
Laura Ingraham read this entry from the Daily Kos the other night, and then I found the text over at Wordsmith's place. It is pretty much proof of the reality of BDS:
"I know I'm a Jewish lesbian and he'd probably have me killed. But still, the guy speaks some blunt truths about the Bush Administration that make me swoon...
Okay, I admit it. Part of it is that he just looks cuddly. Possibly cuddly enough to turn me straight. I think he kind of looks like Kermit the Frog. Sort of. With smaller eyes. But that’s not all…
I want to be very clear. There are certainly many things about Ahmadinejad that I abhor — locking up dissidents, executing of gay folks, denying the fact of the Holocaust, potentially adding another dangerous nuclear power to the world and, in general, stifling democracy. Even still, I can’t help but be turned on by his frank rhetoric calling out the horrors of the Bush Administration and, for that matter, generations of US foreign policy preceding".
"Horrors of the Bush administration"? Compared to Amadwhackjob? I would point out that the author doesn't mention how Iran sends bomb making materials across the border to the terrorists, used to murder American soldiers. She doesn't mention his attitude and treatment of all Americans, Christian, Jew, and Atheists alike.
Apparently, she has no problem with those things.
Her silence on these and other atrocities is indicative of the typical leftists overall attitude towards real Judeo-Christian values, and their delusional hatred of George W. Bush.
The terrorists and the American Leftists are more alike than they would have us believe.
The author hates Bush so much that she is willing to overlook the fact that Amadwhackjob is a ruthless murderous dictator and embrace him rather than give Bush any credit for opposing this sort of despotism.
But, she is right. She would be swiftly dispatched in his country. And her Bush Derangement Syndrome is so acute that she would prefer Islamo-fascism to Bush.
And one more observation that prompts a question:
She said Amadwhackjob is "cuddly enough to "turn me straight". Is it possible, in that statement, she inadvertently admitted that she chose the gay lifestyle and wasn't in fact, born gay, as they claim?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
18 comments:
Mark,
You are living on the edge, opening up both the hypocrisy of the left, and the gay issue, which is more hypocrisy of the left all in one blog.
Yes, the BDS is alive and well, to the point that those on the left would willingly give up their freedom just to GET Bush, whom they accuse of taking their freedom. Senseless.
Blessings
The Daily Kos, as a group blog, cannot be held accountable for what is written there.
Besides, it's likely that this particular comment was posted by a Repugnican troll.
Did the school president's harsh treatment of the terrorist leader make it ok to invite him to speak?
And yet, if I speak the truth about Liberals such as this, MY rank and file Liberal commenters will insist, as they always do, that I am sorely mistaken.
Cameron: You asked; "Did the school president's harsh treatment of the terrorist leader make it ok to invite him to speak?"
I would have to say Hell NO! I cannot for the life me figure out why the Liberals all seem to think that the freedoms we enjoy under our Constitution should be enjoyed by everyone, including Scum bag dictators and illegal immigrants, no matter what they do or say. If our government had the gonads, they should have arrested that jerk the moment he got off the plane. They have more than enough evidence of his crimes against humanity.
Mark: If all of liberal whack jobs hate Bush so much and are so smitten by Mahmoud, why don't we just take up a collection and buy them all a one-way ticket to Iran?
"he just looks cuddly"
I suppose she would have taken Hitler home to meet the folks too?
It's unbelieveable, and remarkably revealing how the lefties are willing to toss over all their supposedly cherished values and issues (women's rights, gay rights, free speech etc.) and go all swoony over someone who chants "death to America" and shows he means it by killing Americans.
I've said before that Bush Derangement Syndrome is symptomatic of a deeper self-loathing for many liberals. They hate the very freedom they enjoy just as they despise the people who would sacrifice their lives to protect it for them.
If you need another example of what I am talking about, I'm sure your little pacifist "death threat" Dan the Trab will be along any minute to prove my point.
It is quite possible that Mr. Bollinger was under pressure by Liberals who were themselves not very happy about Ahmadinejad's invitation-- it shone too bright a spotlight on that serious rash they suffer from.
And not just a serious case of BDS, either. How does Columbia justify inviting Ahmadinejad after Minutemen founder Jim Gilchrist's lovely reception last October.
The hypocrisy is even more glaring considering Columbia President Lee Bollinger's faux castigation of Ahmadinejad for being an uncouth terrorist madman but chose to ignore ill treatment of Mr. Gilchrist by Columbia's uncouth terrorist student body.
Coatworth, the dean of Columbia, defended the invitation when questioned concerning the double-standard...by pointing out that the ROTC/Recruiting thingy was not about free-speech. It was aboput the treatment of fags by our military.
Hmmm...discharge compared to hanging by the neck until dead...go figure!
Re, "I cannot for the life me figure out why the Liberals all seem to think that the freedoms we enjoy under our Constitution should be enjoyed by everyone ..."
Because if you persist in being so ... yourself ... YOU will be the next one silenced.
Free speech for all. Period. Period. Period.
Jihad is the new Marxism, I suppose.
The left claims to hate gun toting dark age religious fanatics, and then supports a guy who leads a country that hangs gays, stones women, and threatens to exterminate the Jews. And if we oppose jihadists like Ahmadinejad, we are the bigots, not the jihadists.
This makes absolutely no sense to me.
Ann Coulter explains what Liberals mean by "Free Speech" very well:
When Minutemen leader Jim Gilchrist and his black colleague Marvin Stewart were invited by the College Republicans to speak at Columbia last year, the tolerant, free-speech-loving Columbia students violently attacked them, shutting down the speech...
So the one thing we know absolutely is that Bollinger did not allow Ahmadinejad to speak out of respect for "free speech" because Bollinger does not respect free speech.
Only because normal, patriotic Americans were appalled by Columbia's invitation of Ahmadinejad to speak was Bollinger forced into the ridiculous position of denouncing Ahmadinejad when introducing him.
Hmmm. Free Speech for all...... Does the Constitution expressly provid rights of Free Speech and Assembly to foreigners?
I suppose since he was awarded a visa to enter the country (was he? do presidents of foreign nations need visas to enter the U.S.?), then he was awarded constitutional rights and protections for the term of his visa.
But what about all the Illegals who marched last year? Did they have the right of assembly and free speech? Hmmmm
I'm with the good Reverend. I think we should send them to Iran. How fast do you think they would change their minds, Mark.
I read a post this morning (don't remember whose) that linked to an article that Rosie O'Donnel was going to visit Iran and that Ahmadinejad was looking forward to her visit. One of the commenters said "I thought they didn't like pork!" LOL! A pig she certainly is, although most pigs are far smarter. I'll bet she doesn't bring up the fact that she's a Lesbian, although I wish she would!
Odd, I've never found sewer rats to be cuddly. Ahmanutjob epitomizes the term, "rat face."
I am always amazed and repulsed by the hatred of the left. What kind of twisted mind hates, truly, emotionally despises, people who aren't like they are? I don't think this country has ever seen anything like Bush Derangement Syndrome before. Here is a person who would side with a monster who would have her killed rather than side with her own president. I wonder if she would have sided with Hitler over FDR. No, FDR was a socialist. And it all comes down to that.
Conservatives were repulsed by Clinton, but hatred was the exception rather than the rule. Words that come to mind are contempt, disdain, scorn, disgust, distaste, revulsion, but not hatred.
As you know, I was upset enough by the election of that moral midget to retire from the military.
Even though there is only a hairbreadth of difference between liberal and conservative leadership these days, conservatives don't have the strength, energy, or determination to be haters 24/7
The left ... supports a guy who leads a country that hangs gays, stones women, and threatens to exterminate the Jews... This makes absolutely no sense to me.
Of course it doesn't make sense because it is absolutely untrue. It's another of your ridiculous straw men.
Words that come to mind are contempt, disdain, scorn, disgust, distaste, revulsion, but not hatred.
Not hatred? Ranger, this is interesting logic. Actually it's nonsense.
Thank you, Jim for that thoughtful, in-depth analysis of my comment. That's another trait of the left. All they have to do is make a statement and it becomes the truth.
Lone Ranger, I checked out jim's site a little (as much as I could stomach) and it is not difficult to see how he arrives at such a reasoned, well rounded opinion. (Ha!, my foot.) His sources of reading are nothing but like minded boobs.
Post a Comment