tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post2341030553132521691..comments2024-03-25T04:46:46.000-04:00Comments on Casting Pearls Before Swine: The First Gay President. Hah!Markhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15633208787250567256noreply@blogger.comBlogger62125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-60421169547531385242012-07-05T10:46:09.996-04:002012-07-05T10:46:09.996-04:00What's the betting M is transgender & the ...What's the betting M is transgender & the children adopted.<br /><br />It could ONLY happen in the Good OLd USABobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05343365795429524238noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-90099379948283063152012-06-07T18:31:15.748-04:002012-06-07T18:31:15.748-04:00Allowing Homosexuals to adopt and/or raise childre...Allowing Homosexuals to adopt and/or raise children is child abuse.<br /><br />Parkie, How many of your "studies" (that you have no links for) report on the number of children who have been sexually abused by homosexual "parents"?Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15633208787250567256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-60735423987317231272012-06-07T17:19:50.931-04:002012-06-07T17:19:50.931-04:00Parky,
Guess again. I've read many of the s...Parky, <br /><br />Guess again. I've read many of the so-called studies. Always by psychobabblers and other homosexualists promoting the queer agenda.<br /><br />A child needs a mother and a father for proper upbringing. Two persons of the same sex CANNOT provide the same needs as a normal couple can. In fact, children in opposite sex unmarried households suffer when compared to married couples, but even they have an advantage over those raised by queer couples.<br /><br />Common sense tells anyone with any ounce of it, that kids raised by queers cannot be as stable as those who aren't<br /><br />Get of of denial and quit drinking the queer kool-aid.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-87553074809966331572012-06-07T16:50:36.933-04:002012-06-07T16:50:36.933-04:00umm.. Glenny.. Better start over. Studies have bee...umm.. Glenny.. Better start over. Studies have been completed since the 1950s. They are peer-reviewed. That is a fact. Please, use the google. The articles are everywhere. <br /><br />It has been demonstrated that parents are what kids need. Even better, two good parents. Gender and sexual orientation does not matter.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-50553572563878625002012-06-07T14:23:31.003-04:002012-06-07T14:23:31.003-04:00Parky,
The only studies done have NOT been peer ...Parky, <br /><br />The only studies done have NOT been peer reviewed, and have been done to promote an agenda. That is the fact. <br /><br />And and has been demonstrated, no two men can give a girl what she needs and no two women can give a boy what he needs while growing up. And a child raised by queers will never know what normal human sexuality is, and will be raised to be brainwashed to think homosexual behavior is okay. Just those issues alone prove that children raised by queers cannot be as well off as normal children. All other things being equal.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-17262243157424044872012-06-07T14:11:23.030-04:002012-06-07T14:11:23.030-04:00lol.. Glenny.. Sorry, but large studies have been ...lol.. Glenny.. Sorry, but large studies have been done by respectable groups and universities proving how wrong you are. The studies show that kids, raised by same-sex couples, are "at least" as well off as mixed couples. All other things being equal, of course. But, think about it, same-sex couples really have to want a child. Typically, they are overqualified to have a kid. Its not like they are going to have a kid on accident. <br /><br />But, this is why I love conservatives. Kids are adopted out of an unstable foster environment. Only to have conservatives deny their new parents the benefits of marriage. Creating more instability in this new family. For once.. just one time.. please think of the kids.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-32296381020589125432012-06-06T18:50:11.991-04:002012-06-06T18:50:11.991-04:00Parklife,
The only so-called studies were done w...Parklife, <br /><br />The only so-called studies were done with little information and by homosexualists promoting their agenda. Again, no peer-reviewed study has ever shown that queer parents are better than real ones.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-31335896537670069942012-06-06T16:18:23.968-04:002012-06-06T16:18:23.968-04:00lol.. sorry Glenny.. Try to use the google. These ...lol.. sorry Glenny.. Try to use the google. These studies are everywhere. <br /><br />Spirituality might be your worst argument. But, this is also a discussion for another day.<br /><br />Meanwhile.. Prop. 8 took another hit in the courts. I cant even remember the last time homophobics won.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-74186973758040277652012-06-04T21:18:50.954-04:002012-06-04T21:18:50.954-04:00Parky,
Demonstate a study, peer reviewed, which sh...Parky,<br />Demonstate a study, peer reviewed, which shows that same-sex "parents" are more beneficial. And it has to compare apples to apples.<br /><br />Homosexual behavior definitely is medically harmful, especially male same-sex activity. There are many, many studies to prove that, as well as common sense. Many testimonies by ex-homosexuals prove it is psychologically harmful, and it is spiritually harmful because it is rebellion against God. Those are facts. And if I was home with my desktop where my "favorites" are bookmarked, I'd give you links for the medical evidence. But I'm out of town today and tomorrow.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-69766241301461633622012-06-04T13:05:42.051-04:002012-06-04T13:05:42.051-04:00Sorry Glenny, but you should do some research. Not...Sorry Glenny, but you should do some research. Not only are there studies that show same-sex parents are better, their "lifestyle" is not considered medically, emotionally or psychologically.. or spiritually harmful. They just dont fit your description, but (correct me if I'm wrong) you are not a part of the medical community and do not speak for any part of it. <br /><br />Its unfortunate that you are factually wrong.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-27463343124742958632012-06-01T20:51:08.102-04:002012-06-01T20:51:08.102-04:00No studies have proven same-sex parents to be bett...No studies have proven same-sex parents to be better. NONE. It is impossible.<br /><br />Same-sex "parents" will never teach a proper view of human sexuality, because by virtue of their relationship they are teaching homosexuality as something good an normal, when only 2% of the population is of that deviant lifestyle. and that lifestyle is medically, emotionally, psychologically and spiritual harmful.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-69430543879932603172012-06-01T20:05:39.804-04:002012-06-01T20:05:39.804-04:00Agreed that the State can do some pretty messed up...Agreed that the State can do some pretty messed up things. Im not speaking of a specific State. But, the hypothetical one. And how that one should interact with all its members. <br /><br />While you may think kids can not be better off, studies have shown different. Just saying two mothers or two fathers can never have kids better off does not make it true. <br /><br />Plus, if you think guidance on human sexuality can not be given by a parent of the opposite sex, or that this is the criteria for being a successful parent, then I feel bad for you.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-48998176353959788252012-06-01T19:52:26.710-04:002012-06-01T19:52:26.710-04:00Parky,
Same-sex couples can NEVER have kids who a...Parky,<br /><br />Same-sex couples can NEVER have kids who are "better off," because their kids will not have correct guidance about human sexuality. Two fathers can not give a girl what a mother can, nor can two mothers give a boy what a father can.<br /><br />The "state" recognized slavery, recognizes abortion, and a host of other immoral acts. Sanctioning that which is an abomination does not thereby change the abomination into something good.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-71002915418233899572012-06-01T19:31:00.817-04:002012-06-01T19:31:00.817-04:00Glenny,
Yes. Same-sex couples need "help&quo...Glenny,<br /><br />Yes. Same-sex couples need "help" to have kids. So do some straight couples. <br /><br />I am happy to let you know that kids raised by homosexual couples are better off. Gay parents tend to be more motivated, more committed than heterosexual parents on average. After all they have to choose to be parents. Please, consider the children. <br /><br />Again, you dont have to be married to have kids.<br /><br />.. and.. marriage is not the foundation of society. Sadly, you are making a mountain out of a molehill. <br /><br />People marry for many different reasons. This has been going on for some time and I suspect will continue. <br /><br />Further we are talking about "marriage" in the form that is recognized by the state, not your community church.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-50970663012039031322012-06-01T19:00:23.124-04:002012-06-01T19:00:23.124-04:00Parky,
Everyone grants that some people marry for...Parky, <br />Everyone grants that some people marry for wrong reasons, and abuse the institution. But the vast majority marry for the same reason people have married forever - to join in a unit to raise a family. The fact that a minority of people abuse an institution does not disprove the rule. Marriage is an institution which is the foundation of society, for procreating and raising children in a stable environment. No same-sex union can ever do that - it is impossible for them to even have children without outside help!Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-65858582811201020902012-06-01T14:30:59.857-04:002012-06-01T14:30:59.857-04:00Gay / Straight people raise children. You dont hav...Gay / Straight people raise children. You dont have to be married to do that. <br /><br />I have read comments in news articles about people being married only for these benefits. I dont think its far fetched to think people marry for different reasons besides love or the bible. <br /><br />As for sex, I dont really have any desire to be in somebody else's bedroom. Im not sure about the "morality" of sex. But I think having whips, handcuffs or furry sex is weird and none of this bothers you. It just has to be straight sex between married people?<br /><br />Not to mention that many couples dont have sex. And, I imagine most couples didnt marry just to have sex.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-86584436809544325732012-06-01T11:52:09.005-04:002012-06-01T11:52:09.005-04:00You can't prove that they marry only for benef...You can't prove that they marry only for benefits. Perhaps they see a benefit in having moral sex! And perhaps raising children.Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-89500560392884504662012-06-01T11:45:00.332-04:002012-06-01T11:45:00.332-04:00I think you mean ugh..
You would rather have a ph...I think you mean ugh..<br /><br />You would rather have a phony marriage between two people with the only purpose to gain benefits? Thats kind of messed up mustache man.<br /><br />Side point, Justice Boudin was nominated by both Bush presidents for judicial positions.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-48135906895703859662012-05-31T19:59:21.348-04:002012-05-31T19:59:21.348-04:00Even conservative presidents screw up.
They deny ...Even conservative presidents screw up.<br /><br />They deny benefits because they aren't married. You have to be married to get spousal benefits. Denying spousal benefits to unmarried couples is not discriminatory.<br /><br />There is no such thing as "gay spouse" because marriage is only between opposite gender people.<br /><br />DUH!!!Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-75449783891284277882012-05-31T19:07:47.794-04:002012-05-31T19:07:47.794-04:00?
So.. Marky Mark... you agree that separate is n...?<br /><br />So.. Marky Mark... you agree that separate is not equal.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-15052890924426007652012-05-31T18:36:18.968-04:002012-05-31T18:36:18.968-04:00What's the matter, Parkie? Are you afraid when...What's the matter, Parkie? Are you afraid when your partner dies you won't inherit his vast fortune?Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15633208787250567256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-60939205452169810482012-05-31T16:36:06.576-04:002012-05-31T16:36:06.576-04:00I can see how you are left with that impression be...I can see how you are left with that impression being that 3 of the judges were appointed by conservatives. Even the decision was authored by Michael Boudin, appointed by GW. Justice Boudin pointed out that this will.. obviously.. be decided by the liberal judges on the Supreme Court. <br /><br />Sadly, The Defense of Marriage Act denies gay spouses Social Security survivor benefits, the ability to file joint tax returns and health insurance rights enjoyed by straight married couples.<br /><br />I think we are all striving for equality. Good Luck my mustachioed friend.Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-46788000466851587452012-05-31T14:36:56.054-04:002012-05-31T14:36:56.054-04:00Notice the appeals court was a liberal Massachuset...Notice the appeals court was a liberal Massachusetts one. I still want to know how you can discriminate against same-sex unions by denying them the right to change the definition of the word "marriage."Glenn E. Chatfieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117405535707961903noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-30469569041817822922012-05-31T14:28:54.103-04:002012-05-31T14:28:54.103-04:00Oh my.. the end is near!
"A federal appeals ...Oh my.. the end is near!<br /><br />"A federal appeals court Thursday declared that the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally denies federal benefits to married gay couples, a ruling all but certain to wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court."Parklifenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12507451.post-34090099990521800782012-05-23T21:38:37.079-04:002012-05-23T21:38:37.079-04:00A country that could elect a foreign born Marxist ...<i>A country that could elect a foreign born Marxist anti-American with no experience at anything</i><br /><br />Holy carp!<br /><br /><i>rationality, morals, intelligence and insight</i><br /><br />None of these in your wheelhouse.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com